Research Integrity: Stories of Learning from Overcoming Mass Retractions
Learn about research integrity and how to deal with mass retractions, systematic manipulation, and research misconduct. Hear stories from panelists who started in different careers and now work in research integrity.
![Author profile image](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1389840482046410754/9BcxGjhZ_normal.jpg)
Elisabeth Bik
Science integrity consultant, PhD. #ImageForensics Currently without cat or blue check, but soccer-mom of godson. She/her. https://t.co/V4MR7WVHiT π³π±πΊπΈ
![Header media for article](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fxk0XacaQAEph6h.jpg)
-
Next up #SSP2023
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 1, 2023
Research Integrity: Stories of learning from overcoming mass retractions, systematic manipulation and research misconduct.
Hannah Smith @WileyGlobal
Yael Fitzpatrick @GazelleInDminor @PNASNews
Luigi Longobardi @LuigiLon @IEEEorg
Mike Streeter @WileyGlobal pic.twitter.com/iKdzF9H3um -
The panelists all introduce themselves - they now work in research integrity at a publisher, but started in very different careers. It is a relatively new type of career, and often started with a volunteer role in ethics. #SSP2023
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 1, 2023 -
Each panelist will talk about their current job and how they deal with certain cases.
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 2, 2023
YF: The right thing to do is not always the easiest or most pleasant thing to do. Our journal suspected misconduct and rejected a manuscript, and we reported it to the institution. #SSP2023 -
YF: Another case: A peer reviewer reported that a manuscript was submitted to two different publishers ( how to deal with that while respecting editorial confidentiality? #SSP2023
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 2, 2023 -
LL: @IEEEorg has retracted 1000s of conference abstracts, our org is currently responsible for 25% of all retractions. We received complaints about quality of certain conference abstracts and decided to investigate thoroughly (100,000 papers)
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 2, 2023
See: https://t.co/OzvkzLLBeg#SSP2023 -
LL: we did not just retract these papers, we closed certain chapters and let certain volunteers go.
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 2, 2023
We now have much stricter quality requirements for new IEEE conferences and higher level of technical review.
But regaining trust will be a slow process. #SSP2023 -
MS: Our story: we recently announced the retraction of hundreds of papers from our Hindawi portfolio because of suspicions of paper mill activity. This was a big effort, but transparency about these cases is important. #SSP2023 https://t.co/D0x1w78t74https://t.co/kfIgO11gv5
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 2, 2023 -
YF: Publishers can review, but not legally investigate, we cannot e.g. confiscate lab books. That is up to the research institutions. We also do not deal with the people behind allegations, but we deal with the scholarly record, the papers. #SSP2023
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 2, 2023 -
Q from the audience: how careful are you about sharing specifics on how e.g. paper mill activity was exposed? Sharing such details might alert fraudsters how to fraud better.
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 2, 2023
MS: we share that we found a paper mill, but we do not share all intelligence we have gained. #SSP2023 -
LL: It is frustrating that we retract papers, but cannot go after the people who make money off these paper mills. There is even Twitter account tweeting about social media advertisements: @fake_journals - but who uncovers these organizations? #SSP2023
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 2, 2023 -
Audience Q: Based on what you learned, how did your organization learn from that and now do differently?
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 2, 2023
YF: We focus more on e.g. tools to investigate image integrity.
MS: We introduced new screening tools and guidelines.
LL: AI tools will be both threat as opportunity.#SSP2023 -
Q: Does this increased screening include your preprint articles?
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 2, 2023
LL: Yes, we are looking into policies for that.#SSP2023 -
Q: What is the future of research integrity and what are you most excited about?
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 2, 2023
YF: There will be more bad stuff in the future. But I am excited that we will have increased tools of dealing with that. #SSP2023 -
LL: There will be more paper mills in the future, but at least that will keep me employed!
— Elisabeth Bik (@MicrobiomDigest) June 2, 2023
MS: Standardization of workflow of the editorial process will increase screening. And I am excited about collaboration.
HS: Thank you all for your participation. #SSP2023