The Biden White House and Vaccines
Find out what happened when the Biden White House complained to Facebook about their page not growing fast enough. Learn about the controversy surrounding the J&J vaccine and the firing of an advisory board member.
Jay Bhattacharya
Professor Stanford School of Medicine. MD, PhD. Health policy: infectious diseases, covid, health economics. Scientific freedom.
-
That time when FB deboosted the Biden WH for being anti-vax, a🧵:
— Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) March 25, 2023
After months of hectoring @Meta to delete and deboost true content regarding vaccines, on July 15, 2021, the Biden White House complained to FB that its FB page wasn't growing fast enough for its liking.
1/5 -
An email from FB to the White House: "FB take[s] aggressive steps to reduce the spread of vaccine hesitancy and vaccine misinformation on our platforms... We have measures to help ensure we don't recommend people follow accounts that promote vaccine hesitancy at scale..."
— Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) March 25, 2023
2/5 -
"...For two weeks in April (April 14-28) this measure [to censor anti-vax content against the White House's official FB account] was impacted by over-enforcement on a signal we used."
— Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) March 25, 2023
3/5 -
What had happened? Well, April 14-28, 2021 corresponds closely to the dates that the @CDCgov and Biden White House had "paused" the J&J vaccine, which killed momentum for vaccine uptake in the US. FB algorithms caught the White House out as anti-vaxxers.
— Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) March 25, 2023
4/5 -
Ironically, the @CDCgov and @CDCDirector had fired @MartinKulldorff from an advisory board for publishing a piece in @thehill arguing that the data at the time did not warrant pausing the J&J vax. The White House fired him for being too pro-vax.
— Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) March 25, 2023
5/5 -
Sources:
— Jay Bhattacharya (@DrJBhattacharya) March 25, 2023
1) The WH email complaining about FB deboosting and FB's reply are in the March 13, 2023 filing in Missouri v. Biden: https://t.co/G6RCt0Ijv3
2) @MartinKulldorff's piece in the Hill: https://t.co/W8ImRvcL8a